Tuesday, 20 September 2011
Tommy Catchup
Monday, 29 August 2011
Bike Mayhem 2
Thursday, 18 August 2011
Bike Mayhem
Q: What are the chances of beating odds of 30,000-to-1?
A: Pretty good, as it goes. Which the following story will illustrate.
So I’m up in
We see a decent Dawes mountain bike. Rusty chain? Check. Tyres going flat? Check. Bits starting to go missing? Check. Though just the handlebar grips, nothing major. It’s on a combo-lock – puny little things, really, up against a couple of lusty swishes. But I ain’t got nothin’ to swish with. Ah, the dream – and then, the other dream: the dream I was having wherein I sit and wonder, hey, just how long would it take to go through all possible combinations anyway? I dream it out loud. I dream it with my hands. I think, let’s give it a little go. Except…
Except who can be bothered with that? Let’s just have a little play and move on (all this takes place, by the way, because through various circumstances we were late for the showing of a movie and ended up wandering instead – delightful synchronicities such as that, more of which later). I have a go at birth-years: obvious choice. I try the eighties. No dice. I try the nineties – young people are so young these days! – but nothing there either. Not seventies, surely? But it is. 1974 and off it pops. I hold up the two ends of the lock. I giggle. And off we walk with our newly acquired bike. Now we’re hungry.
Girlfriend wants to take a little trip. Girlfriend wants her own bike too. Rack and rack is perused. Some, blatantly left to rot and rust; others…you’re not so sure about, best leave them. And then there it is: a beautiful maybe thirty years-old black
And in the morning? Well, wouldn’t you just know it – while we’re discussing what to do and I’m ideally playing with the combo-lock on that neighbouring horizontal tourer – I think, start at a thousand this time – that one simply gives up the ghost and comes apart in my hands as well. 1018. Three wildly divergent number. Yet maybe three minutes code-busting time in total. Thirty-thousand to one, baby: oh yeah. And now we two have three, and the work begins.
The racer needs some tightening, a new back wheel, some pumping and some brakes. We find the wheel and brakes by the train station on an almost crumbling old Peugeot with a sticker threatening scrappage if not removed soon. We fix her up, pump her up, and she’s a beaut. The tourer needs a front innertube and a rear tyre and a new seat: easy. And the mountain bike just wants a good pump and some grips. It’s a few hours work, a fiver for an innertube – did scavenge one but that blew up – and some fun time outside a bike shop cobbling it all together and borrowing the nice boys’ pump. And then we end up by the train station thinking about plans: what to do now (we’ve got camping gear, thinking about a little trip) and how to get all this back to
Hiya, I says, how’s it going? You want to buy a bike?
He looks at me puzzled, scratching his head.
It’s weird, he says, this bike here – the tourer – it’s exactly like one I had stolen a few weeks back, except it’s different. But the bell, these markings here, they’re definitely mine.
A slight gulp. But it’s all good, I feel.
What’s different, I say?
The back tyre, he goes, and the saddle. When did you buy it? he says.
Aha. We found it. We found it this morning. It was abandoned. Is that your lock? I ask.
No, he says, it had a different lock.
We found it by the Sainsbury’s on The Plain.
I left it on
And, blah blah blah, we do the boring bit of the conversation and it turns out that it is this bloke’s bike, and we’ve either nabbed it from the thief, or from someone the thief sold it to, and by some miracle upon miracle this poor nice chap has got his bike back all fixed and groovy and he gives us a fiver for the innertube and we send him on his way with a nice new lock and all three of us are standing there shaking our heads and laughing at this little slice of awesomeness. I mean, what are the chances? Of our being there, of those bikes being there, right in his view as he’s on his way home from work? Even when I chained ‘
PS Notes on this story:
1. I don’t think it’s wrong to liberate abandoned bikes. I do take care to ascertain that they’re genuinely abandoned. And I really hope I’m right in this.
2. For hours afterwards we were obsessed with looking at bikes: my brain ‘n’ eyes were magnetised towards them. I didn’t even want anymore. But the possibilities, man, the possibilities…
3. Now when I look at combination locks I think, poor saps, it’s about as much use as a piece of string. Even to go through all ten thousand numbers would only take about two hours. But I’ll bet you I could crack ‘em much faster than that. Thank God I ain’t into nicking.
4. The
5. Don’t try this at home, unless you know what you’re doing. Cheers! :-)
Wednesday, 27 July 2011
groovy email
A School Bursary has become available. We are able to offer you an award equivalent to 100% of Home/EU fees, £4,200, on condition that you take up your place on the programme.
Before I send you the official letter, could you let me know if you still would like to be part of the Writing MA and if you'd consider taking the Bursary? If at all possible, I'd like to know by Friday 29th July. I apologize for the tight deadlines. We are trying to allocate these bursaries to deserving and promising students like you.
All the best.
Dr. Javier Stanziola
Post-Graduate Taught Programmes Director
And I reply:
Monday, 18 July 2011
2 good, 3 bad
Thursday, 7 July 2011
Death
Anyway, in the event it took her quite a long time to get around to dying - she was well into her senile nineties by the time she popped her clogs - and I do believe hers was the first funeral I ever went to. And then, within a couple of years, I'd been to see both my other grandmas buried too. Funny thing is, I found them all quite jolly affairs. Nice to see everyone together. Family I hadn't talked to for ages. Sandwiches and crisps. And, more than any of that, the sense that those shrivelled up tired beat old women were off up there in the astral somewhere really having a rather funky time all free from the shackles of this body, the drudgery of their lives here on Earth. It was groovy. I imagined that and I imagined them then reborn sometime soon, all freed from their pointless and fearful minds, cute kids, toddlers in little pink dresses, bare knees pumping away on tricycles and smiles and excitement and happiness where once only lonely, stress-filled evenings of Eastenders and Coronation Street had been and it really made me smile. I remember standing there in that old black tie and feeling massively filled with joy. And then realising that I was massively grinning too. And thinking I'd better tone it down a bit. But I had a block of cheese in my pocket and that made me laugh. And then all the sincerity and sombrenous of it, people taking it seriously. There's a part of me that knows the way I see things is perhaps a little weird - and by weird I instantly realise I mean: not usual in the localised current and recent society - and yet...when I type all this and contemplate it, and think of the alternative, I realise - to put it bluntly - that it's a far superior and more beneficial and infinitely more healthy way of thinking about life. Listen: it's no measure of mental health to be considered well-adjusted to a sick society.
I remember on the way back from my dad's mum's funeral, me and him were squeezed up in the back of his drummer's van - oddly surreal enough - and he was saying to me weird things like, "she could have waited, you know," and, "I think she was selfish, going like that." "Why?" I said, "what did she have to hang around for?" "For us," he said, "for me and you and Steven [my brother]." Well what could I say to that? It was bizarre. The idea that this poor woman who spent ninety percent of her day in a state of high and lonely anxiety, fretting about every little thing, with really nothing to live for should cling on to life for the sake of three men who didn't really need her...well, there was no way I could get my head around that; I guess he was just expressing something for himself. But, for me, I couldn't have been happier for her. Really, what was there to live for? And what kind of life compared to the realm of spirit, and the re-entry into new body, new mind, with new parents and friends and adventures and, instead of nothing, a billion things to look forward to. I've heard it said that some cultures mourn when a baby is born - for that is the beginning of suffering - and celebrate when the body dies and the spirit is freed. It's an interesting way of looking at things. I can't say I subscribe to that either - but it's perhaps a bit more sensible than the alternative. Anyways, I'd say let's celebrate 'em both.
Monday, 4 July 2011
Wimbledon
Other great matches I saw…well, it’s all become a bit of a blur right now. Baghdatis against Djokovic was awesome – especially those match points he saved, that would’ve surely took the roof off if it’d been on – and also the eventual champion’s next match against the always-entertaining Jo-Wilfried Tsonga. Tsonga knows how to whip up a crowd – and it’s not exactly difficult. Sure, you smile. And make a few funny faces. And if you can throw yourself to the ground every now and then, even if you don’t really need to – so canny, that Tsonga! – then you’ve got ‘em in the palm of your hand. Nothing Wimbledon loves more than a diver. And the commentators ooh and aah and it makes you wonder if no one’s ever tried diving before, such is their amazement. But as a master-diver myself – hell, I dive on the badminton and squash courts, to quite successful effect, and would probably dive on concrete too, if I had to – I know it ain’t no big deal, and not that tricky – ‘specially on that lovely green grass – and I’m surprised that more of them don’t do it. Ah, the days of Yannick Noah and Jimmy Connors, Becker and Leconte! But it’s so easy to hark back.
And then we come to Murray. Andy Murray. Oh, Andy, Andy Murray. Whither was thou, man? Playing such awesome tennis, cruising through to the semis, bossing Nadal around for a set and a half – and then: one sloppy volley that would’ve given him two break points in the second and – boom! – it was all over. He was never in it again. Head down – head being shook – negative and defeatist and, yet again, so pessimistic, so lacking in the fighting spirit, so purely and woefully British. I know what he was thinking when he came to hit that shot: I know it ‘cos I do it myself, in squash, in ping pong, even in tennis (which I’m not much good at; I play like a girl). He was thinking: wow, easy volley for two break points, break him, win the set, two sets up, match in the bag – I’ve beaten Nadal! I’m in the final! – and then, wow, I’m gonna do it, I’m gonna win Wimbledon, I’m lifting the trophy, imagine the headlines, imagine the smiles, the poor slumped head of my defeated opponent in his chair, the cameras flashing, the newspapers whirling, and after all those years, no more talk of Fred Perry, of Bunny Austin, of bloody Tim Henman, it’s all me me me, Andy Murray, Wimbledon Champion 2011 and – oh bugger, I’ve missed it. Well, how could he not? How could he hope to concentrate with all that going through his head? How could his body flow freely and do what comes so naturally with all that tension and excitement and adrenaline? And so he put it long. And then: oh shit, he’s got me, he’s beating me, I haven’t won, I’ve blown it, I got carried away and how could I be such a fool, will I get it back? No! Missed another one! I’ve lost it – I’m losing it. Losing the semi, losing the championship. Nadal’s gonna win, there’s nothing I can do. Oh why oh why oh why – never get carried away, never think like that, come back next year and –
It’s over. Murray’s gone. His head’s gone. Just play out the match and shake your head and think back to how many times we’ve been here before. Everybody knows. Everybody feels it. The crowd feels it as it’s happening and there’s nothing they can do. It’s the British mentality. We just don’t know how to win. Gallant losers, maybe. Plucky hearts and efforts, perhaps. But when it comes to the crunch – well, we’re just not Spanish, are we? We’re not Americans or Australians. We just don’t have that fight. Henman explains it and accepts it. But Becker and my Spanish roommate Diego are like, WTF? Maybe they can understand what was going through his head – but what they can’t quite grasp is why he didn’t sort it out, why he couldn’t put it behind him, fight on, shake off the demons of negativity and regain his belief. Yet how could they understand? They’re not British.
I wish I’d been good at tennis: I’d’ve given that crowd something to shout about. None o’ that petulance lark – and plenty of buffoonery, plenty of diving, plenty of giving my life for the cause. Your heart on your sleeve. A spring in your step. A cheeky Leconte wink and some of that handing-your-racket-to-the-ballboy and geeing the crowd up. So easy to win people over. They love a character. They’re the ones we remember.
And so, Baltacha and Murray and Robson try their best and, as ever, come close but come up short. Oh well, there’s always next year. And, of course, Murray’ll feel that his name’s written on that trophy somewhere in the future – just as Henman always did. And maybe it is, and maybe it’s not. Is he good enough? Sure he is – but that’s no guarantee of anything. A certain Malivai Washington got to the final once, not that long ago: there’s luck and weirdness to take into account too (Ivanisevic’s glorious rain god, anyone?) Still, another four or five years for him to have a crack – and if not him, someone else. And maybe one day a Brit who can embody some of that belief and that ability to win that other nations seem to manage so effortlessly – and perhaps that’ll change everything.
Anyways, let’s not forget that Murray’s only Scottish. And let’s not pretend that having him win would feel anywhere near as sweet as a bona fide Englishman’s victory. Do we really feel the same cheering him on as we did old Tim? I don’t.
At some point in this tournament I noticed the commentator’s were doing my head in. And I realised why: it’s ‘cos they’re all ex-pros and they keep talking about the technical aspects of the game – spin and slice and unforced errors and serving it out wide and percentages – when what I really want is some posh old bloke with a velveteen voice enhancing the drama and the beauty who’s just as amazed and impressed as I am. How many staggering points were diminished by Greg Rusedski chipping in with some pointless insider’s insight that took all the magic out of what we had just witnessed? Henman and Becker and Castle and Petchey when I’d have given anything for Dan Maskell and his innocent delight mirroring that of the millions watching. How many times listening to someone talk about how a certain player “needed to get his first serve percentage up” – so what you’re saying is, he ought to try and hit more in rather than out? – instead of rejoicing in the glory of the whole occasion. Wows and OMGs and “He’s missed it!” Seems to me it’s gone this way in a lot of sports and I’m amazed people don’t seem to have picked up on it; amazed that the people in charge of the production companies think that the best way to enhance a viewer’s experience is to stuff a commentary box full of former players and have them take the game apart with all the skill and romance of a vivisectionist’s knife. But who’re the ones we remember? Ted Lowe. John Motson. Bill Threllfall. Old plummy-voiced posh blokes who understood that less is most often more. I mean, who’s gonna be mourning John “Personality Like A Turtle’s Fart” Lloyd when he’s dead and gone? At least McEnroe talks sense. But where’s the next generation of congenial old chaps who truly love the game and have the ability to impart that love? They’re the ones I want on my screen.
Meanwhile, a couple of hundred thousand people were digging Glastonbury, the world’s biggest and, some would say, best music festival. I like the sound of that – I’m down with anything “biggest and best” that’s linked with our little island – but I really gotta wonder what Glastonbury’s become. BeyoncĂ©? Coldplay? U2? Since when did Glastonbury become a festival of middle-of-the-road pop-rock? Who next year? Hootie and the Blowfish? But I guess things change: it’s not all hippies and drugs and grunge these days – not that I really like those things either – it’s posh girls in designer wellies and a bit of a lark in the country. Pah. Festivals, shmestivals: I’ve been to Glastonbury twice and, to be honest, I couldn’t give a monkeys anyhoo. First time was in 2000, when I was sort of in the area and wandered on down after hearing the fences had been smashed in. Sunday afternoon it was; I stayed for a couple of hours, walked here and there, and then got bored. And then, foolishly, I went for the full monty in 2003 – didn’t pay; worked for Oxfam doing a bit of stewarding – and I swear I spent the whole four days looking for somewhere quiet that didn’t smell of piss. Wasn’t easy. It was just noise, and retards, and crap activists, and pissed-up otherwise normal people sitting around little fires of burning plastic and metal seemingly undisturbed by the waves of black, toxic smoke that were washing over them. Mostly what I remember is these fires, and the people staring into them – people who probably wore suits and baulked at dirt any other time of the year – and it all just seemed to me like the whole thing was an attempt to create an instant third-world city in the Somerset countryside. It was pretty grim.
As for the music…well, I saw Radiohead, and I do love Radiohead. Although, when I say I saw, what I mean is that I stood in the middle of a massive crowd and, in the distance, looked sometimes at some specks on a stage, sometimes at some images on a screen – the same images people were watching on their TVs at home. But at least I was hearing them, right? Wrong. Mostly what I was hearing was the stupid bellowing of the drunks around me, out of tune and – well, credit where credit’s due – I suppose they were getting maybe half the lyrics right. Poor old Thom Yorke. He’s on the stage, looking out into the crowd, and he’s thinking, wow, this is awesome, look at all these people loving what we’re doing, feel the energy, man, dig this magical moment – we’re changing the world! And yet, the reality is this: some imbeciles bombed out of their skulls who just want something familiar they can sing along to and who actually enjoy the end of the song more than the content of it because that’s when they can scream and cheer and go “whoop!” and “yeah!” – which is what it’s all about, the music’s just the backdrop for that. It’s pearls before swine, mate. Give me a nice pair of headphones and a pure, unadulterated listening experience any day.